Hello! I'm Maressa and I am a 17 year old female just trying to get through high school relatively unscathed. I can't quite explain what's happening on this blog but please enjoy! Books are my life and my favorite author is constantly changing. Feel free to message me about books, feels, Stephen Colbert, the clash, or anything else you deem worthy.

Jon Stewart regarding racism. (via adderalldust)

(Source: anotherwellkeptsecret, via dogdrugs)

You’re tired of hearing about it? Think about how fucking exhausting it is living it.
Notes
13044
Posted
2 hours ago

vvni:

i really needed to see this

(Source: lolgifs.net, via mishastardis)

Notes
118127
Posted
2 hours ago
fangirltothefullest:

nokiaofficial:

scalematecapekind:

howtfdidevrynamegettaken:

truestfeminist:

digital-joker:

I remember this…Chick got caught cheating on her bf so he put the child locks on the car and locked the girl inside with the roaches.

No woman deserves to go through this. I dont care if she was cheating, woman are allowed to express their sexuality and this is basically slut shaming. Her boyfriend was probably awful and abusive anyway.

Man cheats = emotionally abusive swine
Woman cheats = strong woman expressing her sexuality
Got that?

CHEATING IS FUCKING CHEATING. WHEN YOU ARE IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH SOMEONE, YOU DEVOTE YOUR LOVE AND SELF TO THEM AND ONLY THEM. IT’S NOT FUCKING ‘EXPRESSING SEXUALITY.’ IT’S A GODDAMN BETRAYAL OF TRUST NO MATTER WHO THR FUCK YOU ARE.

finally someone said it

Yes, cheating is cheating and yes people who cheat are terrible and cheating should never happen, but man or woman or any other designation of “gender”, it is cruel to lock a person in a car with a box disguised as chocolates filled with roaches  and this kind of behavior shouldn’t be praised.
You can deal with someone cheating on you without resorting to childish and pathetic comeuppances. 

fangirltothefullest:

nokiaofficial:

scalematecapekind:

howtfdidevrynamegettaken:

truestfeminist:

digital-joker:

I remember this…

Chick got caught cheating on her bf so he put the child locks on the car and locked the girl inside with the roaches.

No woman deserves to go through this. I dont care if she was cheating, woman are allowed to express their sexuality and this is basically slut shaming. Her boyfriend was probably awful and abusive anyway.

Man cheats = emotionally abusive swine

Woman cheats = strong woman expressing her sexuality

Got that?

CHEATING IS FUCKING CHEATING. WHEN YOU ARE IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH SOMEONE, YOU DEVOTE YOUR LOVE AND SELF TO THEM AND ONLY THEM. IT’S NOT FUCKING ‘EXPRESSING SEXUALITY.’ IT’S A GODDAMN BETRAYAL OF TRUST NO MATTER WHO THR FUCK YOU ARE.

finally someone said it

Yes, cheating is cheating and yes people who cheat are terrible and cheating should never happen, but man or woman or any other designation of “gender”, it is cruel to lock a person in a car with a box disguised as chocolates filled with roaches  and this kind of behavior shouldn’t be praised.

You can deal with someone cheating on you without resorting to childish and pathetic comeuppances. 

(via daledani)

Notes
32960
Posted
2 hours ago

winchester-in-the-tardis:

nateswinehart:

Being good to each other is so important, guys.

Well that escalated quickly

(via mishastardis)

Notes
116576
Posted
2 hours ago

jarulest:

women: *are killed, beaten, raped, and put down constantly for hundreds of years just for being women*

woman who is also a feminist: *cracks a joke about men on the internet*

men: ”see this is the problem with feminism it promotes hate speech they’re no better than sexist men why can’t i punch women in the face and why does the guy have to pay on dates #equalitarianism”

(Source: kimyefanclub, via celestial-delinquent)

Notes
70323
Posted
3 hours ago

best-intentions:

lemounade:

lemounade:

if you started liking arctic monkeys after AM came out i don’t like you

indirect to every arctic monkeys “”“fan”“” at my school

God forbid someone isn’t fortunate enough to be introduced to a band until a v successful album is brought to their attention which they connect to and like and then discover all the music they’ve missed from them. wow sorry people are introduced to bands at different time periods.

(Source: suxxulents, via daledani)

Notes
162321
Posted
3 hours ago

allmymetaphors:

i accidentally showed some weakness earlier today it was disgusting i would not recommend it 

(via dogdrugs)

Notes
222487
Posted
3 hours ago
hellgated:

karaokeandmime:

dennys:

Some Denny’s booths you enter and enjoy a nice meal, others you enter and travel magnificent distances through space and time….

Denny’s what the hell

hellgated:

karaokeandmime:

dennys:

Some Denny’s booths you enter and enjoy a nice meal, others you enter and travel magnificent distances through space and time….

Denny’s what the hell

(via mishastardis)

Notes
15872
Posted
3 hours ago

noworshipformoffat:

burntlikethesun:

allpossibleentendres:

anotherhobo:

apileofgoodthings:

#that awkward moment when a 48 year old scifi show has more continuity #than a 2 year old series about misfit high schoolers 

*ahem- 50 year old…

But also that awkward moment when the Forest of Cheem’s sacrifice is relegated to unimportance in Moffat’s world. Her bravery and kindness don’t matter, and she’s turned into yet another cheap joke about women being infatuated with the Doctor.

That she fancied the Doctor did not feature at all in the season 1 episode. She was curious about his origins, she had sympathy for him, and she gave her life so he could save the rest of the people aboard the base. I personally don’t see her fawning over him (like so many of Moffat’s women do). Thus, with no real evidence to draw this from, Moffat seems to be interpreting her sacrifice as “fancying” the Doctor, which is immensely problematic: It suggests that she did this only for him rather than to save everyone on the ship, and it shows yet another example of Moffat thinking that any woman who interacts with the Doctor must be infatuated with him.

Even if she did fancy him, the fact that Moffat considers her actions negligible in comparison to her “crush” is pretty gross, especially when the payoff from this line is so small. All it does in the context of the episode is set up the Doctor as an object of desire. But in the context of the show, it undermines the agency and power of women to act with bravery and integrity without it being all for the Doctor.

lmao i remember complaining about this exact same thing on this exact same gifset back in 2011

additionally THAT’S NOT EVEN HER NAME

her name was Jabe??? this is like saying ‘i met the human race once. they fancied me’

I think the tags should have been #that awkward moment when Moffat tries to reference his predecessor’s run and that’s what he comes up with

(via my-little-sherlock)

Notes
101036
Posted
9 hours ago
TotallyLayouts has Tumblr Themes, Twitter Backgrounds, Facebook Covers, Tumblr Music Player and Tumblr Follower Counter